Your spend touching this concern
$3,889.79

3.0% of the period's outflow

Merchants involved
6

with sourced evidence in this dimension

Amazon $3,148.92 · 103 txns

Ultimately benefits Amazon.com, Inc. · Amazon → Amazon.com, Inc.

Violation Tracker lists environment: $20.06 million / 27 records.

medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Amazon.com, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

Amazon Web Services $197.46 · 7 txns

Ultimately benefits Amazon.com, Inc. · Amazon Web Services → Amazon.com, Inc.

Violation Tracker lists environment: $20.06 million / 27 records.

medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Amazon.com, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

Starbucks $180.11 · 10 txns

Ultimately benefits Starbucks Corporation · Starbucks → Starbucks Corporation

Violation Tracker lists environment: $146,000 / 3 records.

low severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Starbucks Corporation · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

The Home Depot $179.00 · 6 txns

Ultimately benefits The Home Depot, Inc. · The Home Depot → The Home Depot, Inc.

Violation Tracker lists environment: $94.15 million / 69 records.

medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent The Home Depot, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

McDonald's $135.98 · 7 txns

Ultimately benefits McDonald's Corporation · McDonald's → McDonald's Corporation

Violation Tracker lists environment: $82,030 / 6 records.

low severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent McDonald's Corporation · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

Taco Bell $48.32 · 2 txns

Ultimately benefits Yum! Brands, Inc. · Taco Bell → Yum! Brands, Inc.

Violation Tracker lists environment: $6,374 / 1 record.

low severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Yum! Brands, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)

Honest limits: only researched merchants (53 dossiers so far) can surface here, evidence is dated and owner-level records don't prove the parent owned the subsidiary at the time of every violation. This is decision support, not a moral verdict. Back to Spending Values