7.0% of the period's outflow
labor practices
Wage theft, union busting, unsafe conditions, supply-chain labor abuses.
with sourced evidence in this dimension
Ultimately benefits Amazon.com, Inc. · Amazon → Amazon.com, Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $113.00 million / 26 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Amazon.com, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Synchrony Financial · Synchrony Bank → Synchrony Financial
Violation Tracker lists safety: $22,300 / 1 record.
low severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Synchrony Financial · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Apple Inc. · Apple → Apple Inc.
Violation Tracker lists safety: $70.02 million / 5 records; employment: $57.98 million / 4 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Apple Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Walmart Inc. · Walmart → Walmart Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $1.76 billion / 144 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Walmart Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Synchrony · CareCredit → Synchrony
Violation Tracker lists safety: $22,300 / 1 record.
low severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Synchrony Financial · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Amazon.com, Inc. · Amazon Web Services → Amazon.com, Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $113.00 million / 26 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Amazon.com, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Starbucks Corporation · Starbucks → Starbucks Corporation
Violation Tracker lists employment: $87.01 million / 19 records; safety: $3.92 million / 17 records.
medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Starbucks Corporation · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits The Home Depot, Inc. · The Home Depot → The Home Depot, Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $126.80 million / 46 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent The Home Depot, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits McDonald's Corporation · McDonald's → McDonald's Corporation
Violation Tracker lists employment: $37.06 million / 51 records; safety: $169,205 / 19 records.
medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent McDonald's Corporation · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits The Walt Disney Company · Hulu → Disney Streaming / Disney Entertainment → The Walt Disney Company
Violation Tracker lists employment: $285.96 million / 25 records; safety: $630,677 / 37 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent The Walt Disney Company · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Brigade Capital Management and Macellum Capital Management · Family Dollar → Brigade Capital Management → Macellum Capital Management
OSHA entered a corporate-wide settlement with Dollar Tree and Family Dollar operators to address repeated workplace hazards including blocked exits, blocked fire extinguishers, electrical-panel access, and unsafe material storage.
high severity · workplace safety settlement · U.S. Department of Labor (2023-08-23)
Ultimately benefits Alphabet Inc. · Google One → Google LLC → Alphabet Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $260.16 million / 15 records.
high severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Alphabet Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Ultimately benefits Yum! Brands, Inc. · Taco Bell → Yum! Brands, Inc.
Violation Tracker lists employment: $54.86 million / 39 records; safety: $756,667 / 16 records.
medium severity · regulatory penalty summary · attributed via parent Yum! Brands, Inc. · Good Jobs First Violation Tracker (2026-06-02)
Honest limits: only researched merchants (53 dossiers so far) can surface here, evidence is dated and owner-level records don't prove the parent owned the subsidiary at the time of every violation. This is decision support, not a moral verdict. Back to Spending Values